Implicative Truth Synthesis, Soccer Match, and Electronics Engineering

Let's consider the initial conditions for electronic equipment, lenses, sensors of cameras, electronic circuitry for signal processing.These are all starting points, premises, or even axioms for electronic circuits inside cameras. Then human beings as spectators in front of TV. The TV screen with its light emissions represent the generators of initial premises for the sight receptors in spectators' eyes.. Neural signal, carrying these initial conditions, travels to our brain through neurons, and after some image processing, becomes a representation of the idea of an image - connected with other parts of brain to form a full meaning representing the game's current state, players actions, rules of soccer, the importance of match, which is the final state in the Implicative Truth Synthesis chain of actions.

We can see how recognizing and then decoupling a complex system of a a soccer game along axiomatic boundaries helps us define various professions and putting them in the order of absolute and relative values. Soccer player is one profession and one axiomatic system. It has postulating power in relation to the camera's sensors linked to well designed electronics circuits. That's another profession - electronics engineering. Note how they are decoupled - electronics engineers can make camera's for any event, not only for soccer. Moreover, electronics engineers are interested only in the input premises - the light that comes shining on the circuitry sensors. How the game goes and who is winning is not of interest to electrical engineer during the process of the electronic circuits design. Note, however, the importance of the initial conditions, initial premises for an electrical engineer. Those initial conditions represented by photons hitting the sensor circuitry are very important for electronic circuit design, but for the designer it does not matter where these photons come from or what concept they represent.
   
After some important image processing in cameras, the signal is sent to the digital telecommunication system. The components of this system, that transfers the signal from camera to the TV receiver (through antennae and cables) is another axiomatic system and can define another profession with its axiomatic boundaries - telecommunication engineer. Again, initial conditions or initial premises for this system (the system really does not care where are they coming from) are the signals from the cameras. Then, the output of the telecommunications system is the signal that enters the TV. Here, TV is another axiomatic system. And the TV design engineers is another profession. Why these professions can be distinguished between each other? It's because they are defined with their axiomatic boundaries and connected with each other ONLY through the postulating power from one system to another and the new system is defined via Implicative Truth Synthesis - a state from one system can postulate initial premise to another, can imply it, and this implication synthesizes a new truth. Otherwise these systems are decoupled and can exist independently from each other. One great example of this is a TV receiver - it can be designed, produced, sold completely independently from telecommunication system and cameras - yet in order to function it relays on the initial conditions, initial premises that are, in the case of the TV receiver, generated by the telecommunication circuits.
   
If you want to succeed in any profession, in addition to gaining massive but structured knowledge of inner workings within profession, you need to recognize which initial conditions dictate the development in that profession. This is important for two reasons - one is that you can clearly see where to focus in your domain to gain knowledge and apply your creativity based on these initial premises; the other reason is that by knowing the initial conditions of your system of interest you can see how other systems influence it - through their postulating powers to define YOUR initial conditions for your system development. So, in order to, let's say professionally succeed, using Premise Based Implicative Truth Synthesis you delineate systems along their axiomatic boundaries, see how they are linked through postulating powers from one system to another, and finally choose a system whose inner workings you are going to master. These inner workings are often realized as courses in universities, seminars, or courses offers by people who have this specialized knowledge. The drawback of this, you will not hear almost anything about cross disciplinary links between the subject of study and other knowledge domains. It is important to see how the decoupling these systems along their axiomatic boundaries using Implicative Truth Synthesis allows you to chose one (or more) professions and it tells you on which one you are going to focus on. This means, for instance, that soccer player does not need to know the inner workings of the camera, and camera man does not need to know how to signal is transmitted from his electronics circuits to the TV receiver. So soccer player will not study the theory of electric circuits, signal processing in order to succeed as a soccer player in the same way an electrical engineer will not spend four hours a day running, doing push ups, and lifting weights in order to advance his or her knowledge of the design of electronics circuits.
   
Given all this, innovation and success come from the skill to chose the system of interest for which you will master your skills, learn all possible initial conditions that can be given to your system of choice, how to successfully process this information within your system, and what are you going to do with your results - link to another system.
   
The money from the tickets is also distributed along the axiomatic boundaries. A portion of the tickets money goes to the players salaries - potentially millions or tens of millions of dollars (or other currency). Telecommunications companies pays for the rights to transmit the game to the viewers, but charge viewers who are cable subscribers. Obviously, there is a general big difference between salaries of a (top)soccer player and an electronics engineer or a cameraman. Or a TV designer? Or a CEO that organizes TV design and production? Premise based Implicative Truth Synthesis, as we saw, is the central reasoning method in all these cases. The monetary value is determined within social context - what people like to see and watch - demand and supply. And, for even bigger success, it is this social domain for which you are going to position the results of your profession - are you going to be an electronics engineer or a soccer player? Or an organizer that can see clearly different interacting domains and organize the flow of action between them? How would you influence, with the results of your profession, purchasing decisions of your potential customers?

Check out my book on Amazon, "Power Reasoning for Success!"